Human Review Protocol
Automation needs a human checkpoint. This protocol defines where and how review happens.
Human Review Protocol
Human Review Protocol addresses automated workflows run without human checkpoints, so errors propagate and judgment-based decisions are made by rule. The workflow combines process, automation, and human review to resolve it.
Automation needs a human checkpoint. This protocol defines where and how review happens.
Problem definition
Automated workflows run without human checkpoints, so errors propagate and judgment-based decisions are made by rule.
Observable symptoms
- ✓The problem recurs despite effort
- ✓No systematic approach to resolution
- ✓Manual workarounds that do not scale
- ✓Unclear ownership or accountability
Likely causes
- ✓No defined process for the problem
- ✓Manual handling that varies by person
- ✓No automation to enforce consistency
- ✓No review or measurement of outcomes
Required inputs
- ✓A defined process for the workflow
- ✓A system to track and enforce it
- ✓Clear ownership
- ✓Measurement of outcomes
Recommended workflow
Follow this sequence to address the problem systematically.
- ✓Map each workflow and identify decision points
- ✓Define which decisions require human review
- ✓Set review triggers and thresholds
- ✓Provide reviewers with context and authority
- ✓Log review decisions for accountability
- ✓Refine thresholds based on review outcomes
Automation boundaries
Automation triggers reviews and logs decisions. The review itself, the judgment, and the override require a person.
Human review requirements
A person reviews at each defined checkpoint, applies judgment, and is accountable for the decision.
Risks
Reviewing too much creates bottleneck; reviewing too little creates risk. Set thresholds based on the cost of an error.
Limitations
No workflow is perfect. Continuous review and refinement based on outcomes is essential to keep it effective.
Measurement criteria
Track the occurrence of the problem before and after, the time to resolution, and the outcomes of the workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which decisions need human review?
Those that affect customers, compliance, revenue, or relationships, and any where the cost of an error is high. Low-risk, repeatable decisions may not.
How do we avoid review bottleneck?
Set thresholds so only genuinely uncertain or high-stakes cases reach review. Automate the clear cases and review the edge cases.
Who should review?
A person with the knowledge and authority to decide. The reviewer must be accountable and have the context to judge well.
Work With Elias Curtis
Get in touch for business consulting, AI strategy, web development, speaking engagements, or digital asset evaluation.